What's Wrong with Rock
By Louis Torres
"Michael Jackson is expected to arrive in Bucharest!"
I was told upon arriving in Romania. "That's too bad,"
I thought. My wife and I had just come from Poland, where we
had presented talks on the effects of music. I now wondered
how to alert the unsuspecting youth of Romania to the dangers
of rock music. They hunger for anything that symbolizes "freedom"
and are totally vulnerable to the subtle-but not so innocuous-effects
of this powerful American influence.
Thousands flocked to the concert to hear Michael Jackson. Not
long after the program began, the media televised pictures of
those whose unconscious forms had to be passed overhead-transported
by the mob's uplifted hands and arms-to the waiting medical
staff for resuscitation. Other fans swayed, twisted, and contorted
their bodies in response to the overwhelming pulsating rhythms
emanating from the rock star's highly amplified and well-orchestrated
band. Still others acted dazed and almost hypnotized. The audience
seemed to be caught up in a high state of exhilaration-temporarily
abandoning any sense of self restraint, and clamoring for more
potent doses of an unseen "drug." These scenes
invoked "instant replays" of my own experiences
in show business as bass player with Bill Haley and The Comets.
People often wonder: "Is music really that potent? Or
are these people-whose behaviors range from a state of hypnotism
to an almost uncontrolled frenzy-just putting on an act?"
No, it's not an act. Music really has that power!
In fact, it has been known for several millenniums that music
is a powerful medium capable of producing the above-mentioned
phenomena. Both Plato and Aristotle were cognizant of this
fact. More than three centuries before Christ, Aristotle wrote
that "Emotions of any kind are produced by melody and
rhythm ... Music has the power to form character ... ."1
Howard Hanson, a prominent composer formerly with the Eastman
School of Music, states: "Music is a curiously subtle
art with innumerable, varying emotional connotations. It is
made up of many ingredients and, according to the proportions
of these components, it can be soothing or invigorating, ennobling
or vulgarizing, philosophical or orgiastic. It has powers
for evil as well as for good."2
As a young man in show business, I often boasted about the
power my music had on people. I exulted over my ability to
manipulate the crowds both physically and emotionally. However,
at the time I had no idea how or why it worked. What is it
about music that affects us, as human beings, and brings about
these alterations?
Music is made up of rhythms. Tones, from which we build melodies
and harmonies, are produced by rhythmical vibrations (a certain
number of vibrations per second produces a given note). In
fact, the first three elements of music-melody, harmony, and
tone color-are the result of the arrangement and "quality"
of these rhythmical vibrations. What we usually refer to as
"rhythm" includes the grouping of tones into "measures"
of music, as well as the tempo at which these groupings are
played or sung.
An interesting fact that may give us clearer insight as to
why music has such power over the human frame is that we are
also essentially rhythmical creatures. "There is rhythm
in respiration, heartbeat, speech, gait, etc. The cerebral
hemispheres are in a perpetual state of rhythmical swing day
and night."3
Since both music and man are rhythmical, it is not difficult
to understand why a person exposed to music begins to assimilate
its beats. This is demonstrated when a person begins tapping
the feet or exhibiting some kind of body movement in response
to music. Thus, the body automatically alters its own rhythms
to synchronize with the outside stimuli.
What is actually happening within the body is that "sound
vibrations acting upon and through the nervous systems give
shocks in rhythmical sequence to the muscles, which cause
them to contract and set our arms and hands, legs and feet
in motion. On account of this automatic muscular reaction,
many people make some movement when hearing music."4
It is because of this automatic rhythm emulation that music
can alter us physically, mentally, and emotionally. The critical
question, then, is which types of music or what part of music
reacts adversely with our body functions and brings about
these changes?
In 1987, scientists conducted a series of experiments to
find out what kinds of music would be harmonious to body rhythms
and what kinds would not.5 They divided 36
newborn mice into three groups: the control group, which was
not exposed to music; the harmonic* group, which was exposed
to simple classical music; and the disharmonic* group, which
was exposed to disharmonic rhythms typical of rock music.
For two months, the harmonic and disharmonic groups were
exposed to music night and day. After these two months, 12
mice-four from each group-were sacrificed and their brains
were properly prepared and frozen for later study.
Next, the other 24 mice were exposed to three weeks of maze
"training." Then they were given three weeks of
rest, during which time no testing or maze reinforcement occurred.
Finally, the mice were exposed to another three weeks of maze
training to establish their degree of learning retention.
Throughout this process, behavior changes and discrepancies
were carefully noted. At the conclusion of the maze training,
these 24 mice were sacrificed and their brains were studied
along with those of the previous 12 mice.
The results of the study were sobering. The mice of the control
and harmonic groups were very similar; no significant differences
appeared. However, the disharmonic group showed a significant
decrease in learning retention/memory, hyperactivity, and
aggression. (During the three-month preliminary testing, some
of the mice exposed to the disharmonic music resorted to cannibalism.)
Some mice in the disharmonic group experienced lethargy and
inattentiveness, while all experienced significant brain alterations.
Because of the nature of the study and the particular animals
chosen for the experiment, we have every reason to believe
that these same results occur in humans. This means that the
rhythms typical of rock music are the main culprits: "disharmonic"
music causes brain damage and behavior degradation. It is
interesting to note that these behavioral changes are easily
observable at any rock concert, as I mentioned earlier in
the description of the Michael Jackson concert in Bucharest.
An added problem of rock music is the words of each song,
which penetrate with force and seek to seduce the hearer.
Once the person is mentally disoriented, the mind is then
open to whatever suggestions the words may carry, whether
it be sex, drugs, suicide, violence, abandonment, or even
religion.
Because of the dangers inherent in this now-American legacy,
it is important for Christians to guard themselves from its
effects. We should learn to adjust our taste in music to that
which is a melodic, purely "harmonic" style of music.
In this style, the rhythmic groupings will always be very
loyal to the naturally accented beats of the time signature
(i.e., in 4/4 time, the first and third beats of the measure).
On the other hand, disharmonic music can most quickly be
identified by its "swing" beat or syncopation, which
moves the hearer away from the naturally emphasized beats
(i.e., it emphasizes the second and fourth beats in a measure
with 4/4 time). This off-beat syncopation tends to cause a
side-to-side movement in the listener's body, thus distinguishing
it as "dance" music. This side-to-side movement
is a "telltale" sign that music has had a disorienting
effect on the listener's body rhythms.
Because music enters directly into the autonomic nervous
system, thus bypassing the master brain, the only time one
can choose what happens to his body is before he listens to
the music. Let's make those choices count on the side of healthy
bodies and sound minds.
1 Aristotle, Politics, 1339 a, b.
2 Howard Hanson, "A Musician's Point of View Toward
Emotional Expression," American Journal of Psychiatry,
Vol. 99, p. 317.
3 American Mercury, September 1961, p. 46
4 Willem Van de Wall, Music in Hospitals, (New York:
Russell Sage Foundation, 1946), p. 15.
5. Gervasia M. Schreckenberg and Harvey H. Bird, "Neural
Plasticity of MUS musculus in Response to Disharmonic Sound,"
Bulletin, New Jersey Academy of Science, Vol. 32, No. 2, Fall
1987
|
"Music can be soothing or invigorating, ennobling or
vulgarizing, philosophical or orgiastic. It has powers for
evil as well as for good." - Howard Hanson
"Are these people - whose behaviors range
from a state of hypnotism to an almost uncontrolled frenzy
- just putting on an act?"
|